Eyes of the Globalization

   Globalization is a word whose concept has yet to be understood by most researchers. I said that because I have seen variations that could be more interpretative. I would begin with what word is formed. By the last, we have a suffix that led us to action, a movement from particularity to a social conjunct of people, and the prefix Global, from lat. Globus, sphere, indeed represents a  perceptive object conditioned. It is a linguistic, symbolic definition of our planet. It needs to be more direct and clear because our planet is not a platonic sphere but a periform model of the totality of whatever the Earth seems to be.

    The conceptual problem about using a spheric sense is certainly still from Plato, one of your abstract geometric solid models. Take off that we could see from that scholastic inversion a feature from Globalization word with a pronounce of ideological propaganda, marketing about some idea. In that sense, Globalization is hiding something, not only in a domestic metaphor free. Nothing is free or is nothing by being free and not freedom.

    All things are in the act, in action, or better, saying which all is in movement. So, in thinking from physics, the parameter changes in the suffix. We can remove that suffix without transforming the word in that stranger case. However, only Global gives us the meaning of an abstraction of a perfection whose value is terrain, belonging to a sense of glebe. Since colonization, the world has not been a place to plant or useful ground for plantation and harvesting.

    Will it be that the objective sense of Globalization is new colonization? We can follow another trail. So we are in the fugue that trial. We can affirm that it treats an artificiality. It is an artificial creation. Globe came from lat. globus that refers to the orbits of the eyes, ocular globe. It only discusses a matter of a material perception rather than the globe as eyes—something belonging to a human practice that recognized it. Globe and eyes seem to be better than other things. It is a comparative analysis What does globalization want? Take out our eyes? Eliminate our human experience shared? It is possible that the creator of that word had hidden an intent of birth control of our social practice, the human experience of life, and social coexistence.

    For that to happen, Globalization would have to take anyone from the original or native community. From our eyes, at first, would seem impossible or violent and cruel. Well, it gives us an understanding as it emerged from many places an immense wave of migrants worldwide. We can ask if artificial forces have provoked it and what made them move from one place to another.

    The natural relationship and interaction in society create moral rules, tradition, knowledge, technologies, techniques, idiosyncrasies, ways of perception of the other, a coexistence into an exchange, business in a concretion process maybe millenary, and a bio-psychic structure from a phylogenetic organization and constructing own reflexology and a culture. Why would they want to go from your warm and sweet community to a stranger culture and life? Most would dare to think about what made them go from there. The forces implication are in that tragic history? No few times, a question is an affirmation — an affirmation like an isle bordered by doubts.

    So, Globalization is an artificial word created not to leave us to see -  by our globe - the violence and cruelty of a forced homogenization process, supplanting cultures for another dominant made, to do it, in an instrumental understanding of social values, where the other is only a thing, a parcel fluid to be used, and disposed of whole own humanity. It comes from the Globalization process, logical, from a plan and projects of an artificial culture created to the production of items and business, coming from a corruption system in that the relations are pragmatical and the human relation has been of exchange.

    In an ethical sense, has that happened of a radical view platonic,  of a geometric and hygienic humanity? I do not know. I have discovered what was hidden in the Globalization world: an economic ideology, radical in its motive, the economy live of the lack. There is a lack of place, social value, community, singular integration, and culture; what rest? From a gregarious perception of life in that blue home, a soul desperate without helplessness until trained and deformed from old life, in void technicist without a minimal sense of humanity.

    Ok, we go thinking in a positivist view: the future accumulative is in their hands. The future starts and ends now when the goods are in your hands: love, home, belonging, freedom, and rights out of your culture.

    So, is the culture that matters. It is the demolition, import, and interest in the Globalization process. It is what does not appear elsewhere: the radicality positivist of universal reeducation, acculturation, a framework structure made in aims, like a ladder in steps, pieces, nothing entire, a fragmentary Education, fasciculus of knowledge, an application subjected in a scientism technicist, cold and without word, thinking, metaphor, jump to unknown, a foolhardy education from Cartesian logic objectivated only to a glebe productive, abstract same when is a material item, like Carlitos playing of owner of the world.

    Greed is a global view from ocular globes filled with rancor, resentment, envy, and selfishness. Cumulative, therefore, it is in eternal surveillance of a little torturer god with the skill of prostituting their sons. But, we can leave it exaggerated and say that it is Globalization. They still do not take out our eye because we are in action against it.     

#######

    Charlie