Autumn times

  I have been finding some chances to read books that are not very well known. It does not lead me to make notes and discover others. I spend more time filling my thoughts until I do not have more time to do other things. It is not good while it is a way of lost time; same knowing that reading is necessary for those who want to protect the mind against ills. The read is similar to taking time on the road wearing away the shoe sole because, after some experience could note that, like a read,  everything.

    I had gone to the house of a friend and saw the stuff that he had there, read what he liked, and what not much, the bookshelves followed tips, the orders systematic disciplines, themes, literature or science, anyway, I read that he had preference by architecture than literature, more about science than art or general culture. The book's dispositions on the shelves showed my friend did not have some abstraction about metaphors or some subjectivity that led him to a transcendental vision about the borders of thought. 

    I noticed that his evident interest could give a leap in structured knowledge and find a proper mode of understanding social life. I saw it before leaving his home, after our traditional coffee from our culture. A niche with books on the left side of the shelves caught my attention.

    The books there were more scrambled and more used. What that was passed in my thinking and saw what he seak. It books from comparative language. I guess that was from linguistic or old idioms, Latin or Occitan. Sometimes in a read, we discover signals about the author's proposes, which are more densified or extremely simple. The curtain, a veil, or a roundabout in a writing stage can show characters other meanings and sense this like an etymological representation, opening our eyes to a different understanding.

    Thus, a word repeated or read backward, a paragraph floating in the context can be a contextual synthesis or a strong criticism. The linguistic interest in architecture history indicates a  correspondence of values by affinity. A type of complementary intent to know about human relations with the large vision about belonging, of family, home, uttering sense of freedom, transformation, construction of a character (does not personality - from Greek is Persona -, but in the sense of moral values, something always is changeable and malleable with the decisions, in the prominence of ethical position). My friend has an accurate understanding of friendship. I could realize, from our culture, that before going, he gave me a little gift, logically a book about music history, a little old in French.

    

    This contextualization without that we enter into a psychological perception of the other has another path, a synthesis of social relation into a culture. He was reading my idiosyncrasy on the pace, and it since when I looked at his bookshelves. He read me and knew what I liked, given that book. Nothing is separated. The things are in connection, and all people have a reference for each other. An act on the water moves the shores, the external terrain world.

   I do not be someone like Jung said or seems to have noted in the Dreams, something like the world is more loaded with persons that need to teach others; this, because their lives do not, has a sense and teaching they think overcome personal problems, a world fulfilled of speakers, fanatical educationist, and moralists. I do not want to be someone that type, thanks.

    Although I think in many cases differently, and indeed I do not have a substantial understanding of psychoanalysis and do not use that for my search, I search to be someone that recognizes wisdom as  Jung and other authors.

A plan

    A plan made with directrices is the path with some aims that degrees produce answers. It is because any text has its context, and all thinking before anything is duplicity. First is an ask, and second and at the same time, within response is a doubt. We are done with uncertainties is the logic math imposes it as a solution between extremes,  dualities narrows.

    To want to be another person need first to be who we are, as to leave being who we are, so the better to do is not to believe who we are but not be a narrative wandering in the world. We need to be a narrative and be who we believe to be.  And who wants to be. Well, the duplicity, our double turned inside out, the twice gave us an answer: we can create a plan with directrices, each one of them is a necessary project, but now we know that in the conjunct of we be a cultural or idiosyncratic person walking away and a belief in our self, we are whatever being: who we want to be.

    The exercise is: believe that you are who you think that is, then look for inside from memory, gestures, costumes, what you wear, the disposition of things, what you read, and train to do it narrative showing what seems to be you. After, choose to be who you want to be. Simple, magic, but it is a soft and also a mental and bodily exercise hard. Doubt? Try to do it.

     After a youth wasted working to make money or to think of a better future, the autumn came as a surprise. I organized a daily schedule, and some months after did not stay at work like before. I worked all day to do better in my office to develop my compromise with an affective life that is not opposed to my worker state. On the contrary, it integrates my human condition.

    I created daily objectives and simply aimed to do them. I did it. I would need to know how I was until I arrived at this moment; I thought to see the world through a mirror. A back shy for a world that I would see again like me. I would believe that and could say I belonged to this world and lived in it. It was logical that if I searched through the world, I would meet myself in it.

    It would be easy to understand the world, turning it into my own. The people would live in my world, and I could understand who I was, if I was good or bad, weak or strong, a Manichaeism in that the perception of mirror light reflected by displacement could be a reference. So, in the autumn existential, I could know who I was or what could be in this world.

    I discovered that I had random thoughts and idiosyncrasies from my culture. I would sit at a table with tastes, interests, and habits. I would have a measure reasonable of my daily and the trained routine, a low expectation of happiness, little hope, and did not understand amusements.

Why do my friends like that?

        Coexistence with others, a critical view social, desire for good, money, or success were things that I did not understand. What was that person? It was only a reflex, a portion of a world significant that I did not achieve. This mirror shows me a mediocrity life around me, people who do not like what I think is fantastic and others who always kill my back. Some that I could have told them anything that they would understand and give support. I did not say.
        My intent by imagining myself in a mirror reflex had something of a halo, a double duplicity in that the dualities from Manichaeism it does not fit. The number of things about that reflection can show me what was present more; the habits, the repetitions, the routines, the cultural ways; they were like anchors that prohibited the boat's departure from the harbor.

        I seek to know through a synonymy from the words routine, randomized model, repetition, mores, conduct, reflex, attitude, customs, morality, behavior, manner, mode, species, manual, catalog, method, techniques, features, style, personality, social rules, characters, traditions, habits. The habit synthesizes a periodic scale of a similar sense of words. Changing the pattern is like a signal transfer in a place we use with our way of occupying it.

        The thing's position, if nearby or distant, the daily objectives, people around or not, silence or noising, is a mode of provoking changes. The act of moving things around in a space interferes with our routines. The position of furniture, the location, and the items help to change our behavior. The exercise is repeated, over and over, with the scale of activities separated at a time for each.
        Why change our habits? For what? If we think about the state of our lives, the good and the boring, what could we do that does not have this habit? Change is not a turn to hell, into the deep sea, or to lose the way. Changing habits is a quality, a good, a value we give to our lives. I do not want to change my costumes, which is the same as saying: I do not want to change my behavior. Unfortunately, we do not have a mirror that shows behavior with all the criticism necessary to understand who we are. We look into that mirror and say: I don't want to be that. Do we want to be chained to habits? In static forms of our behavior too? Change a pattern; change things around.
       The space at home changes, and life changes together. A time for ourselves added, an extra time of life, some discovery about the school of life. We are at school, learning, and coexisting with others on a bike will be a novelty, perhaps singing or doing meditation.

        A plan changes habits, getting things out of place. An old time doesn't work again. The old man changed his pace. Do you have a plan? Have to write many things? I do not know, but to build terrain to do anything. Transform the mountain, the volume accumulated in a plain. Knock down that mountain making a plain to plant whatever feeds our lives.
        The risk of change is similar to the time spent climbing this mountain of habits conformed with a behavior. The procrastination, delaying in the decision, climate, evaluation, techniques, and strategies frozen by the ultimate character, a delegated will to carry out a hemisphere towards the north pole in a tourist program of sensorial rehabilitation of farewell to life.

        If we believe that a thing is a space pressured in a contoured place in borders and limits, if this place is like a thing in itself, centered in itself, is equivalent to the human being, so we are mobiles things with restricted function, and the knowledge is something that is accepted in our being-thing. In an organic sense, the materiality thing, the human, in its existential decomposition process, is not a thing, same that by similarity, an item also disappears. I think we do not have the condition to dominate the analytic techniques beyond the vision of art, the transcendence of matter, as happens for some fortunate in art.

        The algorithm does not fail because it is not human, and the miss and mistakes are what produce human beauty. The war is correct and dynamic. The bad of a crime or anything cruel is just an infallible algorithm, a logic of immorality. Fail that I speak is the human magnificence that turns the good same faraway a presentness of the humanity that can fail. Failure is the ethical practice that someone chooses when does is not bad.
        We think our AND changes together with our actions, it encrusts, and we say it is customary. It is nothing. It is something that comes from habits of cultural behavior. And also a cultural reproduction, traced with a trace of thought in a deep mark that follows a neuronal path and easily conforms to habits, bureaucracy, politics, or whatever interferes in our life. Is not only a simple act that changes the AND configuration; all around us, the rules of society, community, etiquettes, forms of coexistence, a street or a garden, vary too.

        Change is like a move in that we go but leave something behind. The difference is like having the opportunity to know who we are, not being a good thing at first. But it is still one thing to think about. Artaud said a thing is not a thing if not what we think about that thing. We evaluate things in an organized, finite place. If we want to to to to move something from one place to another, it is reasonable that doing it also makes the structure of an old thought change.

        Habits do not birth alone. These repetitions in conventional habits are created by layers, stones of life sedimentaries, and to change or overcome that neither with individuality if accept the slow culture in its movement, living on the exit board while is submitted in the community rules. The mind can change. A life is changed. It can reach an internal value, transforming our thinking into something else.

        We could change our perspective and expectations about what we do to live well. Habit wins again. We return maybe with force and sediment again our customs, maintaining our way of being. However, if we are not careful, it does not take long to recover like we were. It is not easy being human. All people would like to be. To be without shape, without skin, without work, without remuneration, without advantage, without prejudice, just being in the way of to be.

        It is not possible in this world made up of things to use, polish, clean, keep, offer and also lose. Like us: eating, bathing, lying down, waking up, walking, working, and dying. All people would like to be. To be without shape, without skin, without work, without remuneration, without advantage, without prejudice, just being in the way of to be.
        It is cleaning to throw in the trash or to recycle. It is baggage to God to open is not very fair. We could have fewer sins, desires, things, and closed minds. It is difficult for those interested in winning and are obsessed with life following a path leaving behind something that could be good because he does not dare to change.
        Changing space, place of things, behavior, and ideology are habits equally. It hides an internal behavior that imposes on any change. Change things. It does not affect this person who lives with a will ideology for freedom, which makes him eternal changing without changing a particle of his mentality. The selfish life vision needs bombing with explosives of faith. It is not purchased at a grocery store or available in a market. It is like something expensive that can buy over time.

Maybe life does not end before buying it...

        The autumn teaches little things that disappear before our eyes, like oblivion, our memory dancing the tango without music. The devotion goes away. Sometimes you can see, sometimes you do not have as see, like Deja Vu, they appear suddenly, or not, is only a taste lost, and anguish for not having a good again, a mental sensation materialized stays in things. Things are like apps, work as a tool in a single direction, are a way of being stuck in thought, and can be used for a technique mnemonic: The thing makes a sign saying that we still exist.
        My oldest rare Chesterfield sofa, my Impala, my rocking chair, my house with romantic windows, my things, my garden with tulips, I kiss my grass. I am an excellent person to have a street dog. No one does it. O, as I am accomplished with my pulsing heart into work. O, my sweet son, going to college with my old Caravelle car. I see my sons running to success.

        I will be a grandfather and could rest in peace, maybe to fish - I do not like to feel, seeing the terrible innocence dying. Maybe lay in a hammock reading a book, making criticism, and in the end, writing it like an appreciation to my mind. Well, it seems to me. It is repetitions; I use the same things, and in a way, the reproduction of a culture or knowledge, a routine, and an acceptance of a mind that does not change. It smells of local conditions, the pattern of habits, personal attachment to things, a pillow, a path.

        Generally, it is fitted into our behavior. It is a way of saying that we are working on something, making a resolution, a chance to know people, perhaps going to a theater, tasting something in a dinner with the unknown, learning, and changing the complex world where we are involved with something simple and different. It is not an Obsessive Compulsive Disease, OCD, or maybe ignorance.
        I took a pencil in my hand. The school sent me away a few times, but the determination of the deep and sweet waters of the river of writing or reading took me to paths that can not be described. I am this man lying in the river in the middle of autumn of my existence, who loves his children and likes to be alone too with my wife's company. I leave out the conceptual groups that put their fingers to their faces and follow fashion. Vanity, as a pencil on the hand.

        I try not to be like that. I take the sky, the fields, the flowers, and the fragrant herbs all morning. I am a being of the dawn, but I never lose the velvety afternoons and nights. I love rain and storms. I love it. I look like it, but I am not afraid of anything; I think I ever was. My father, especially my mother, sweetly led me to read and write. I'm always a primary beginner. Still learning to read and write, row, to let the boat go safely. Well, the days are staying gray.
        Look at her and almost do not know she is someone that lives beside me, cares for me, treats me with a sweet voice, finds a TV movie, sometimes plays piano, or sings an old song. Did you take his medicine today? Do you need something? What you need to do is walk a little, a breath, and rest on the Chesterfield after, do not you think? Look, I moved the beds blue of lobelia, would you like to see them? I love to hear my wife, your ideas, positions, and talking about ordinary things. I think that it has happened because of my age. I am an old man.

        I am in autumn, the period of my organic decay becomes a revelation, taste of life, and understanding a little more of the importance of relaxation. The same happens when I am working. No one needs to wait this time to understand what is possible that can be better for lives. It wants to say our condition needs breath, leaving the commonplace, ridding up whatever obligation or exigence without motives. I can tell that I get upfront about whatever I do to encounter some surprise, anything that doesn't belong or connected with am I interacting.

        This precedent has changed my perspective about time being dynamic and not done with hours but actions several and the variability searching quality forced to meet by low frequency, my friends. I need them, but at the same time, I need to be alone. I think it is a kind of enforced disappearance too. I know the man oxidizes faster than the woman. My bones are creaking. Thus, in a social relationship, just as it is important to be alone.
        We are to take the resolution for doing it. I say to myself: Make a schedule, and then put your priority with quality, some importance for this case. I pay attention, but I always hear phrases like it: you need to seek to do something correctly, get organized, put things in place, have a schedule, and have a personal diary with a discriminated label of things to do. It stays on the trail of personal realizations to life, as it really can be. I believe that we are still experiencing a social and cultural crisis. And to get the thing and tools, it is necessary to be fast.

        The pragmatics as Dewey, Levin, among others, Taylor did as experience, he wanted-less time for the worker makes something, and he wanted to prove that the facilities produce something without importance. The conditions for increased capital gain with less comfort. The experience in its process had distressing situations, he did interferences, and he changed the things of place. He wanted to know if the people gave continuity with what they must make without perceiving the low conditions. He noticed people working the same way in ugly and dirty places did not affect production.

        Only something was necessary to happen: the other, the presence of someone together, the relationships among colleagues, a right of coexistence. They did not need excellent conditions, and the workspace could be without other investments economic for capital. What would make people work harder was their social relationships.         

        Relationships and interactions between them were good, concluding that humans are interested in humans and not in things. The human being works better by having liberty for social relations and interactions, the same thinking in Vygotsky's theory where he appoints that social learning is more effective with other persons. It permits an increase of moral values and dignity, where new subjectivity is possible with qualificatory ethical jumps: the socialization between people, the placements, decisions, a taste of life, the self-esteem that promotes creativity, and identity with ambient.

        Suddenly someone starts to clean the place and improve the social atmosphere. Social life work is the guarantee of more products and services at work. Social liberty in education enables the development of new thoughts, knowledge, and concepts that become collective and available growth means ethical values that are not for an individual subject but all. Vygotsky's thesis was unknown, but the tragic pragmatic experience shows and proves its truth. Through a capitalist production bias, what has the case of some value, is not a measure of suffering in this experience in human work. In addition to that is a humanism that does not have. However, that application has importance in the ability to work, materials, and their human condition revealed.

Creation and transformation

      We know the memory to create crossing a long route was constructed by repetition that confirms knowledge and marks the cerebral traces. This neuronal path remains like a repetition to follow each moment we listen to the same pieces of knowledge learned.

      We are repeating modes, manners, habits, and teaching through repetition. Does could different? Culture tells us how we should dress and how behavior should be ( a way of repetition of social rules).

Repetitive ideas, thinking, creation, invent come from that teaching and lear process, a repetition too.

        If we learned through the pavlovian pedagogy of the bell, the sound produced a correct behavior. Command bell would be a mnemonic way to do something to understand how to take the road, read a map, or use a computer. It is what reflexology shows; instead teach something, the education would be synthesis, a training. The human history from the experience hit and miss empiric is this repetition that marked our mind. And, if everything in our society came from that process of repetition, why do we use it? Not does turns hard decaying in efficacy?

        People always learn more from our bio-psych gregarious life in social relations. However, repetition is a phenomenon of the memory of human history in time. We repeat the paths, modes, forms, and manners of our culture constitutive. Repetition act in the mental reflexology layer, a stratum initial of adjustment of the person in a place. It helps us localize stuff and realize paths among infinite objectives we want to achieve. Pavlov proved the reflex act with his dogs.

        The training to work is different from education learning that seeks to construct free-thinking for a qualitative jump beyond metaphors. It comes from Vygotsky's theory, and it is not very known like cartesian theories, does not less important but less worked with the social contradictions, which increases knowledge.

Education would require independence, not a co-dependency

        Like an orchestra, our life would be set at a time with a baton to organize and control social relationships. The Descartes method, or his Discourse Method, shows how systematic division participates in our lives. We have had this experience from history with feudalism, fascism, and Russian nationalism, says Isaiah Berlin, called communism with fundamentalism. In contradiction with Marx. In contradiction with Darwin, in part, we would say about the law of the strong down by the ground. The division between weak and strong, the task of David against Golias. The method turns into a manual, a catalog.

       An individual education by techniques structured in exchange for interests, the same happens in a world made of ideologic borders, the frontiers of the dogs. The group sustains an ideology whose intent is functional as a thing has a utility. We live in a diverse world that needs diversification in its variations and does not live in a divisionist world feudal.

        The human need for coexistence. The experience is incomplete because one does not evaluate the other as necessary. The other a be relational, thinking with a pragmatic form, which is like a mattress, a cushion against resentment. Social relationships can cherish pain and anguish by showing the experience. Pragmaticism is no-sufficient to understand social relationships and why it increases intellectual and discernment.

        Autumn came with the rain in my eyes. The rainy season in the Atlantic south begins in March (a march to Mars), and May rain again. We see the rain falling slowly, and we are into the strong chains river was like autumn was smiling in my memories of rapid action while I was worried about paying the school and eating tomorrow. Then all of a sudden saw the wings unfolding and flying in the rain, diving into the waters in a paradise to be happy, stopped rowing, and left the chains of water as a guide to us. My son makes his paddle a rudder, and subtle decisions and maneuvers that led us home were good and sweet to me.

Players are protecting a territory.

        There is also the division of areas and time to occupy these places with activities. A time to work, a time to study, a time for whatever fills the day and night, and a time for end play. The division came because the world is dangerous, multiple. Things always need to be taken care of and adjusted, and each one put in its proper place. The mind, the behavior, the use of labels, the honor translated into the marks, the absurd importance of origin, race, form, and content.

        Playing football is an exercise in dominating territory quest of each team member to share with others, following strategies to overcome difficulties and reach the goal. Using uniforms, signs, voices, languages, and idiosyncrasies shows the culture and a revelation of the social being in equivalence with a group structure. A metaphysics discovered by Lukacz as reification. It seems that we seek in life a team, dividing work and reward like Pavlov's dogs. Of course, the dogs in this psychologist's experience also made him obey. When they wanted food, they salivated, rang the bell, and behaved as they had trained. They were trained dogs, not educated.

The complete fugue from reality or the unique exit of public shame is isolation. Living or staying alone, to have a weak idea of social diversification with selfish interest eliminates the fundamental aspect of the subject, the skill of speaking and interacting with others in a universal mode. A life conducted by restricted knowledge, reflexology applied into a metier of science, a Technicism imposed for production and income results.

Technicism postpones the feelings causing something stranger-like, not initiative, to be put aside. 

        Divisionism's purpose is classification. Who does not fit with that thinking is out. Feudalism thought the same, and the divisionism came from a fake ideology legend of Knowledge Society. It gave force to the individualism technique, naturalization of their cultures, community, and interest groups, and its low from other visions.

        Technicist is opposed to universal human integration. It has a low view of itself, and human relationships are dependent, looking like obedience to the parents to keep stuff in their place, to earn money, like sign games between children, a plan bureaucratic,  the technique overlapping the socio-dynamics of life.

Indifference as manifest liberty and accumulation like an existential power make cosmopolitanism a fake liberal or a fake bourgeois. A self-sufficient cosmopolite has a sense of pride from restricted knowledge. It thinks to be an aristocrat. Doe not a wise. A wise shares, the Technicism divide. So we need to stand mute, in silence. Dangerous is the people that do not understand a metaphor; a poem is not more than a recipe for doing something.

Cosmopolitanism comes from the ideology of divisionism and mechanism. It is a regionalist state of individuality without the ability to grasp the meaning and significance of a poetic metaphor or understand a conceptual abstraction. This self-centered individualistic vision of other beliefs is not necessary to follow social rules.

The cosmopolitan does not follow a middle path and is a complete meditation on a deep belly button. The tragic life of cosmopolite remains while the technology bubble persists. Indifference is a way of not conflicts, a capital syndrome that creates the speed education to train people for work.

        Meditation on objects was processed and created by Mahayana Buddhists. Now, training intelligence only to know a technique to develop an enterprise or reach a work future is a "meditation" type that builds a cosmopolitanism that makes the other a thing. Life is circumstantial, a thing. We need further education and another path.

        The path of Tao is a dichotomic, dualistic, contradictory life philosophy. The contradictions impregnate life with constant searches for truth. The contradiction ike could see in the Mahabharata' does not happen in cosmopolitan learning as is the technicist education for work. What looking for is the education Tao, the middle path, a way to teach us to be universal and less ingrained in our culture. God's calling you. Come on, have what to do. In the middle dream, in that crucial moment, you hear on a rainy Saturday: Get up and bright as the Good God makes. Whatever you are thinking or dreaming disappears.

        I understand that the river follows the sea, and our confidence guides us to home youth smiled at me while I could see from his eyes our trip on the river near here, where goes fishing together, only to take nothing. Yes, am I, my gift that reveals my autumn, the time the leaves fall.

      I like to be alone, and that sometimes bothers me. Preferred better eyes to dig through books, to know old stories, different studies, like things related to magic, supernatural but not horror, frightening things do not interest me, prefer something about educating, transforming, from psychology, I think that is this. Alone, neither a stone can live.

      We can fly; the only difficulty is if we have skills with our wings listened to this for a long time and lived with my parents. During all the periods I was a student, it followed like a radio advertisement repetition. In that time to love someone often happens through a cartesian analysis, relates more to an exchange relation, an analogical datum, and comparison like the uniform of a football team. It shows the unbalance between organizing our life through a method of time or laissez-faire, leaving for later. Maybe I live better in an entropic world with a disorganized system that is not anarchic and is not personal. I do not know if anyone needs a place to arrive. Between two points is life.

Creation and transformation

        We know that our memory process is constructed by repetition. Why then use repetition to teach someone? We are repeating modes, manners, habits, and teaching through repetition. Could it not be different? Culture tells us how we should dress and how our behavior should be (by comparison, a way of repetition of social rules) a repeat too. The cosmopolitan vision believes no need to follow the rules or what the media or groups tell us or give importance to do it. Become cosmopolitan, indifferent, and not following the middle path; sophisticated indifference is the syndrome that makes the self-centered, self-sufficient, a technique person focused on an object. Cosmopolitanism makes the other a thing. Life is circumstantial a thing.

         So I heard from my father read the classics and heard from my brother that I should read about technology, gardens, and flowers mother told me to read about social reality and understand Dostoyevsky, the bible, and inspiring authors. It was hard repetitive today, still heard from memory some quotes: No, please, not these books are very dense for you, and this book is not, for now, wait a time, in time, you will read it. I cried because the library was locked, the locked library, so my mom, father, and brothers said to me, why not writes? Responded that could try, does not have a peaceful moment heard again: why do not write something to be a writer is not a great thing, but you could do like exercise; I think that could be better for you.

        I wrote a short story, and they read saying: Try again, and again. It did not take long to realize that I had written a chronicle, an article, a review, a parody, some poem, a romantic tale, and suddenly no more heard from a "do it again." I created a factory of texts with these voices being thoughts in words.

        The school passes the ball to the family, runs to church, falls into the sacred text, turns home, and again goes to school repeatedly does not correspond to what our parents, friends, brothers, and sisters want. I know that we make it in dimension minimal, in options, use reason for making simple options, comparing tomatoes, and a car with another.

        Therefore, exist who make a similar comparison, making options between persons. The belief that someone is a thing of utility, something fits with the idea of someone by face, or dress, a gesture shows the profession each one fits perfectly. If we invert this belief, saying that people do not object, no one could understand, create our steps, create our paths, and design our plans and maps during all existence. Why not teach at school a process of creation? A method, yes, own and personal methodology, a vision singular, of a subject of the will.

      

        Write your plan, I heard.

        Need you to be someone organized like a human being would be.

Am I not a human? No. You need to order first. The mind repeat: writes again - be correct, balanced, available, and ready to do something worthwhile. Think of something, anything super cool, and do it. Look, this text is not good. Try again. You have to do it to become a future organized worker and be a worker now. I am not exaggerating about how you must structure yourself. 

I am talking to a mirror.

      The mind repeats the work making changes again and again. We should stop our spirit search for calm places, an atmosphere of peace, to do meditation, we should try, by the way, for a time to feel better, but this never stops. The mind does not stop. How much does social coexistence increase thinking? This repetition did as a methodological system created by a not good government to torture the people: the mind.

      And the way to do it was to put it into a school program. Repeat, repeat for never thought. It is the process of creating new habits. You will be good and have morals. In the right place, the obligations and responsibilities to yourself, you will shower, take care of your teeth and wake up in the morning before God shines. The only problem is the system, the other things I think are necessary.

        I heard all this during almost my complete existence, see the gestures, that minimal sign, a subtle movement that implies in these words: application, obligation, responsibility, ordering, definition, paying attention, focus, task on the desk, exercises done until now.

Humans learn together while living together in an eminent social life.             

       We learn together and faster, our mental processes more speedily, constructing our subjectivity. A world without subjectivity is a world where literature or some knowledge is capital gain, a manual. It is a world reified in habits and conformability, of comparability for analysis unable ethical decision.

       Does not possible to fight against Technicism simply because the technicist does not understand. The other is only a thing, an object for persuasion, an intricate algorithm that speaks or vomits concepts, does not think, does not have a criticism, is not a human world, techniques and patterned, without what changes, the world does not happen: the hope.

                                                                    #######

Charlie